5. |
Motions
Motion 1
from Councillor Dermot Lacey
This Committee requests a report from the Manager on
the suggestions outlined in the below regarding the upgrade and
increased potential for Sandymount Strand and Promenade including
the establishing of an inter-disciplinary working group to consider
options for improvements.
Structure
- There are five sets of steps leading down from the Promenade to
the beach. There are a few metal handrails. At one side
of each flight of steps there is a sloping ramp, which descends on
the same gradient as the steps. The concrete of steps and
ramps is mainly in poor condition. But most seriously, there
is no visual indication of when the descent changes from steps to
slope. In poor light, or for people not familiar with the
area, this could be lethal. The concrete is the same colour
on ramp as on steps, and there are no marks indicating where the
ramps begin. Anyone stepping unwarily onto a ramp would
tumble down to the beach, or possibly even onto the rocks at the
side. I would be amazed if this has not happened in the past.
It could lead to serious injury, and to liability of the
Council’s part.
- Many years ago, the promenade was protected from the elements by
the placing of thousands of tons of rocks on the seaward face.
I think this has done its job, but over the years some
smaller rocks have become displaced onto the beach itself.
Many of these are partly buried in the sand, and constitute a
hazard for unwary, elderly or poorly-sighted walkers on the beach.
Within the last week we came across a couple in
distress—the man had tripped on a protruding rock, fallen and
injured his face, and was bleeding profusely.
Management
- There are bye-laws affecting the Strand and Promenade, but they
are not well presented or enforced. The most blatant danger
is caused by cyclists (adult) who use the Promenade, which is for
pedestrians only, as a cycle route. There are some faded
inscriptions on the tarmac prohibiting cycling and skating, but
they are few and far between, and they are not backed up by signage
at the entrances to the Promenade. Once again, the danger and
general loss of amenity to walkers is serious. Most cyclists,
when challenged, flip the finger and pedal on. The
forthcoming development of the Strand Road Cycle Route will give
such people a civilised alternative, but as we all know there are
unfortunately those who don’t think in such
terms.
- Dog fouling is a persistent problem on Promenade and Strand.
There is some signage, but in the absence of enforcement it
is easily ignored by owners.
- Both illegal cycling and illegal dog fouling could be
discouraged if there was an occasional warden presence, backed up
by enforcement.
- The rocks on the edge of the beach are alive with rats. I
know this is not an easy problem to deal with, but could more
effective deterrence be put in place?
There’s nothing new about ...
view the
full agenda text for item 5.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Motions
Motion 1
from Councillor Dermot Lacey
This Committee requests a report from the Manager on
the suggestions outlined in the below regarding the upgrade and
increased potential for Sandymount Strand and Promenade including
the establishing of an inter-disciplinary working group to consider
options for improvements.
Structure
- There are five sets of steps leading down from the Promenade to
the beach. There are a few metal handrails. At one side
of each flight of steps there is a sloping ramp, which descends on
the same gradient as the steps. The concrete of steps and
ramps is mainly in poor condition. But most seriously, there
is no visual indication of when the descent changes from steps to
slope. In poor light, or for people not familiar with the
area, this could be lethal. The concrete is the same colour
on ramp as on steps, and there are no marks indicating where the
ramps begin. Anyone stepping unwarily onto a ramp would
tumble down to the beach, or possibly even onto the rocks at the
side. I would be amazed if this has not happened in the past.
It could lead to serious injury, and to liability of the
Council’s part.
- Many years ago, the promenade was protected from the elements by
the placing of thousands of tons of rocks on the seaward face.
I think this has done its job, but over the years some
smaller rocks have become displaced onto the beach itself.
Many of these are partly buried in the sand, and constitute a
hazard for unwary, elderly or poorly-sighted walkers on the beach.
Within the last week we came across a couple in
distress—the man had tripped on a protruding rock, fallen and
injured his face, and was bleeding profusely.
Management
- There are bye-laws affecting the Strand and Promenade, but they
are not well presented or enforced. The most blatant danger
is caused by cyclists (adult) who use the Promenade, which is for
pedestrians only, as a cycle route. There are some faded
inscriptions on the tarmac prohibiting cycling and skating, but
they are few and far between, and they are not backed up by signage
at the entrances to the Promenade. Once again, the danger and
general loss of amenity to walkers is serious. Most cyclists,
when challenged, flip the finger and pedal on. The
forthcoming development of the Strand Road Cycle Route will give
such people a civilised alternative, but as we all know there are
unfortunately those who don’t think in such
terms.
- Dog fouling is a persistent problem on Promenade and Strand.
There is some signage, but in the absence of enforcement it
is easily ignored by owners.
- Both illegal cycling and illegal dog fouling could be
discouraged if there was an occasional warden presence, backed up
by enforcement.
- The rocks on the edge of the beach are alive with rats. I
know this is not an easy problem to deal with, but could more
effective deterrence be put in place?
There’s nothing new ... view the
full minutes text for item 5.
|